Article 269. Grounds for Revising Judicial Acts on Newly Discovered Circumstances

The grounds for revising judicial acts that have entered into legal force on newly discovered circumstances shall be:

1) circumstances significant for the case that occurred at the time of the adoption of the judicial act, but were not and could not be known to the applicant;

2) the deliberately false expert opinion, deliberately false testimony of a witness, deliberately incorrect translation, which entailed the adoption of an illegal or unjustified judicial act in this case, and which is established by a criminal court verdict that entered into legal force;

3) the criminal acts of the person participating in the case, or his representative, or the criminal acts of the judge, committed during the consideration of the case, which are established by a criminal court verdict, a court determination that has entered into legal force;

4) cancellation of a judicial act of an administrative court or a civil court, a criminal court or an economic court, or an act of another body that served as the basis for the adoption of a judicial act in this case.